tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4725136950378904032.post5524791840616555743..comments2013-07-07T11:09:40.661+05:30Comments on The Public Diplomacy Blog: Web 2.0 in Public Diplomacy - Strategic mismatchMadhurjya Kotokyhttps://plus.google.com/111589809286073036644noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4725136950378904032.post-48674504474929635022009-12-15T02:28:45.975+05:302009-12-15T02:28:45.975+05:30Thank you for the reality check, R.S. ZaharnaThank you for the reality check, R.S. ZaharnaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4725136950378904032.post-74408733649497371482009-08-12T23:10:26.869+05:302009-08-12T23:10:26.869+05:30I agree with your assessment regarding the digita...I agree with your assessment regarding the digital divide. Public Diplomacy 2.0 is certainly not a panacea for world issues, especially when access to the conversation is limited or non-existent. I certainly agree with you that the easiest nations to target with mass audience “new media” messages are the more developed countries. However, the conversation needs to start somewhere. If governments like the United States, France and Italy can facilitate the conversation, don’t you think they should? I’d also be very interested in your thoughts on phone texting and its potential in India and other middle power countries where cell phone use and ubiquity is on the rise.Torihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09805962447303240255noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4725136950378904032.post-73531083264479418732009-08-03T22:51:08.609+05:302009-08-03T22:51:08.609+05:30A very interesting posting. I hope it will be wide...A very interesting posting. I hope it will be widely read by PD 2.0 enthusiasts, some of whom tend to be unrealistic about this new technology -- and how truly "interactive" it is. Thank you.John Brownhttp://publicdiplomacypressandblogreview.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.com